Bill's letters declining an honorary degree, unpublished in his lifetime, set an example of personal humility for AA today and tomorrow.
EARLY
IN 1954, after considerable soul-searching, Bill W. made a painful
decision that ran counter to his own strong, self-admitted desire for
personal achievement and recognition. The AA co-founder declined,
with humble gratitude, an honorary degree of Doctor of Laws offered
by Yale, one of the nation's oldest, most famous, and most
prestigious universities. Acceptance would have brought him - and AA
- enormous amounts of favorable publicity. The university, too, would
have received respectful recognition from press, public, and the
academic world for presenting the degree.
Yet
he turned it down.
Would
a yes from Bill have vastly changed AA as we know it today? Would the
change have been for better, or for worse? Could Bill's acceptance of
the honor have sown seeds that, in time, would have destroyed AA?
These are some of the questions that figured in Bill's perplexity and
in his prayers.
The
Grapevine is publishing the correspondence between Bill and Reuben A.
Holden, then secretary of the university. The exchange of letters
followed a personal visit to Bill from Mr. Holden and Professor
Selden Bacon in January of 1954.
The
following week, Bill received this letter:
Yale
University
New
Haven, Connecticut
January
21, 1954
Dear
Mr. W :
I
enclose a suggested draft of a citation which might be used in
conferring upon you the proposed honorary degree on June 7th.
If
your trustees approve this formula, I should then like to submit it
to the Yale Corporation for their consideration.
The
wording can be considerably improved. We shall work on that during
the next few months, but in every instance we shall be sure it has
your unqualified blessing.
Thanks
for your hospitality on Tuesday and for your thoughtful consideration
of our invitation.
Very
sincerely yours,
Reuben
A. Holden
(Naturally,
Bill's full name was used in all this private exchange. In observance
of the Eleventh and Twelfth Traditions, the Grapevine is maintaining
his anonymity at the public level.)
This
is the first draft of the text of the citation:
W.W.:
Co-founder
of Alcoholics Anonymous. For twenty years, this Fellowship has
rendered a distinguished service to mankind. Victory has been gained
through surrender, fame achieved through anonymity, and for many tens
of thousands, the emotional, the physical, and the spiritual self has
been rediscovered and reborn. This nonprofessional movement, rising
from the depths of intense suffering and universal stigma, has not
only shown the way to the conquest of a morbid condition of body,
mind, and soul, but has invigorated the individual, social, and
religious life of our times.
Yale takes pride in honoring this great anonymous assembly of men and women by conferring upon you, a worthy representative of its high purpose, this degree of Doctor of Laws, admitting you to all its rights and privileges.
From
the office of the Alcoholic Foundation (now the AA General Service
Office), Bill sent this reply:
February
2, 1954
Mr.
Reuben Holden, secretary
Yale
University
New
Haven, Connecticut
Dear
Mr. Holden,
This
is to express my deepest thanks to the members of the Yale
Corporation for considering me as one suitable for the degree of
Doctor of Laws.
It
is only after most careful consultation with friends, and with my
conscience, that I now feel obligated to decline such a mark of
distinction.
Were
I to accept, the near term benefit to Alcoholics Anonymous and to
legions who still suffer our malady would, no doubt, be worldwide and
considerable. I am sure that such a potent endorsement would greatly
hasten public approval of AA everywhere. Therefore, none but the most
compelling of reasons could prompt my decision to deny Alcoholics
Anonymous an opportunity of this dimension.
Now this is the reason: The tradition of Alcoholics Anonymous - our only means of self-government - entreats each member to avoid all that particular kind of personal publicity or distinction which might link his name with our Society in the general public mind. AA's Tradition Twelve reads as follows: "Anonymity is the spiritual foundation of all our Traditions, ever reminding us to place principles before personalities."
Because
we have already had much practical experience with this vital
principle, it is today the view of every thoughtful AA member that
if, over the years ahead, we practice this anonymity absolutely, it
will guarantee our effectiveness and unity by heavily restraining
those to whom public honors and distinctions are but the natural
stepping-stones to dominance and personal power.
Like other men and women, we AAs look with deep apprehension upon the vast power struggle about us, a struggle in myriad forms that invades every level, tearing society apart. I think we AAs are fortunate to be acutely aware that such forces must never be ruling among us, lest we perish altogether.
The
Tradition of personal anonymity and no honors at the public level is
our protective shield. We dare not meet the power temptation naked.
Of
course, we quite understand the high value of honors outside our
Fellowship. We always find inspiration when these are deservedly
bestowed and humbly received as the hallmarks of distinguished
attainment or service. We say only that in our special circumstances
it would be imprudent for us to accept them for AA achievement.
For
example: My own life story gathered for years around an implacable
pursuit of money, fame, and power, anti-climaxed by my near sinking
in a sea of alcohol. Though I survived that grim misadventure, I well
understand that the dread neurotic germ of the power contagion has
survived in me also. It is only dormant, and it can again multiply
and rend me - and AA, too.
Tens of thousands of my fellow AAs are temperamentally just like me. Fortunately, they know it, and I know it. Hence our Tradition of anonymity, and hence my clear obligation to decline this signal honor with all the immediate satisfaction and benefit it could have yielded.
Tens of thousands of my fellow AAs are temperamentally just like me. Fortunately, they know it, and I know it. Hence our Tradition of anonymity, and hence my clear obligation to decline this signal honor with all the immediate satisfaction and benefit it could have yielded.
True,
the splendid citation you propose, which describes me as "W.
W.," does protect my anonymity for the time being. Nevertheless,
it would surely appear on the later historical record that I had
taken an LL.D. The public would then know the fact. So, while I might
accept the degree within the letter of AA's Tradition as of today, I
would surely be setting the stage for a violation of its spirit
tomorrow. This would be, I am certain, a perilous precedent to set.
Though
it might be a novel departure, I'm wondering if the Yale Corporation
could consider giving AA itself the entire citation, omitting the
degree to me. In such an event, I will gladly appear at any time to
receive it on behalf of our Society. Should a discussion of this
possibility seem desirable to you, I'll come to New Haven at once.
Gratefully
yours,
William
G. W
Six
days later, Mr. Holden replied:
Dear
Mr. W :
I have waited to respond to your letter, of February 2 until we had a meeting of the Committee on Honorary Degrees, which has now taken place, and I want to report to you on behalf of the committee that after hearing your magnificent letter, they all wish more than ever they could award you the degree - though it probably in our opinion isn't half good enough for you.
The
entire committee begged me to tell you in as genuine a way as I can
how very deeply they appreciated your considering this invitation as
thoroughly and thoughtfully and unselfishly as you have. We
understand completely your feelings in the matter, and we only wish
there were some way we could show you our deep sense of respect for
you and AA. Some day, the opportunity will surely come.
Meanwhile,
I should say that it was also the feeling of the committee that
honorary degrees are, like knighthoods, bestowed on individuals, and
that being the tradition, it would seem logical that we look in other
ways than an honorary-degree award for the type of recognition that
we should like to give the organization in accordance with the
suggestion you made in your last paragraph. I hope this may be
possible.
I
send you the warmest greetings of the president of Yale University
and of the entire corporation and assure you of our sincere
admiration and good wishes for the continued contribution you are
making to the welfare of this country.
Cordially
yours,
Reuben
A. Holden
The
series of letters ends with Bill's acknowledgment:
March
1, 1954
Dear
Mr. Holden,
Your
letter of February 8th, in which you record the feelings of the Yale
Corporation respecting my declination of the degree of Doctor of
Laws, has been read with great relief and gratitude. I shall treasure
it always.
Your
quick and moving insight into AA's vital need to curb its future
aspirants to power, the good thought you hold of me, and your hope
that the Yale Corporation might presently find the means of giving
Alcoholics Anonymous a suitable public recognition, are something for
the greatest satisfaction.
Please
carry to the president of Yale and to every member of the board my
lasting appreciation.
Devotedly
yours,
Bill
W
Recently,
the Grapevine received a letter from an AA who was a trustee on the
AA General Service Board at the time of this offer to Bill. The
former trustee, Cliff W. of California, recalls talking to Bill at
the board meeting following the ex-change of correspondence.
"I
suggested that we make a pamphlet of these letters, as his refusal
letter was truly magnificent. Bill grinned and replied, 'Not while
I'm alive. I don't want to capitalize on humility.'" Cliff
suggested to the Grapevine that it would now be proper to print the
letters.
During
Bill's lifetime, copies of the Yale correspondence were privately
circulated within the Fellowship, with Bill's knowledge and consent.
Jim A., who in 1965 was AA public information chairman for a central
office in a large West Coast city, wrote to Bill, asking permission
to show the letters to anonymity-breakers "...as an example that
AA probably does not need their individual names to keep it going or
to make it more effective."
In
reply, Bill wrote, "Certainly, you may show that Yale
correspondence in a limited way. But I see you agree that it would
not be exactly right on my part to consent to its general publication
at this time. Actually, I'm not so damn noble as you suppose. In
reality, I rather wanted that degree...However, I think the principle
of anonymity will be so invaluable to us, especially in future time,
that one in my position should really fall over backwards in trying
to demonstrate the principle. By way of example, it might help in the
years to come."
Ten years before this, just one year after the Yale correspondence had ended and less than two weeks before the Twentieth Anniversary AA Convention in St. Louis in 1955, Bill replied to a Canadian AA friend who felt that publishing the letters at that time would "help consolidate AA and fortify the anonymity Tradition."
"I agree with you in part," Bill answered, "that publication now could help temporarily. But I do think that publication would imply my permission and would therefore be not a little ego manifestation on my part.
"Actually,
when I declined the degree, I did it with the long future in mind. I
could picture a possible time when AA might find itself in some great
contention and crisis. At that time, this letter, though bearing the
dead hand, might have a marked, even a deciding, effect...Anyhow, I
would be disinclined to have it generally published at present - that
is, published under circumstances which will surely indicate to the
reader that I have given my consent."
Under
present circumstances - seven years after Bill's death - there is
clearly no possibility of the consent that he called an "ego
manifestation." The Grapevine feels that AA members, now
numbering around eight times as many as were sober in 1954, have a
right to know of Bill's example of both courage and humility. This
correspondence may help all of us appreciate the sacrifice Bill made
for us, and for the countless alcoholics yet to come to our
Fellowship for help.
February
1978 AA Grapevine©
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.