This excellent info
supplied by Nancy O. of NE Pennsylvania
In 1956, Marty Mann had
the pleasure of introducing Bill Wilson at the annual meeting of the
National Committee on Alcoholism. This Committee was later to
become the National Council on Alcoholism.
Bill's talk, while it
included his usual "bedtime story," was also a call to
cooperation and understanding and support of all those who are trying
to help the still suffering alcoholic.
National Committee on
Alcoholism Annual Meeting Hotel Statler, New York City, N.Y. March
30, 1956
Introduction by the
National Director of the National Committee on Alcoholism - Mrs.
Marty Mann.
"Mr. President,
distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen, I had to have that formal
beginning to find out if I had a voice. This moment is of such
import to me that I have been fearful for a week that I would not be
able to speak. It's a moment I've been waiting for a long time.
The National Committee on Alcoholism was founded on a proof.
Unless there had been proof that alcoholics could recover there could
have been no National Committee on Alcoholism. That proof was
available by 1944, the year of the founding of the Committee
because of what Alcoholics Anonymous had been doing for nine years.
And the work that Alcoholics Anonymous had been doing for nine years
is very largely due to a recovery of an individual. Everything has
to start somewhere.
We no longer look upon
it as a divine plan, I think we should as divine plans require
instruments, instruments that we can see and touch and hear, that can
reach us. Such an instrument was found in a man who had suffered
deeply and terribly from alcoholism and he was able to recover and he
discovered that in order to keep his recovery he had to share it, he
had to pass it on. I like to describe this as the discovery of a
constructive chain reaction.
Something was set in
motion back in November 1934, that was to become one of the great
sources for good in our time. I was very fortunate in coming in
contact with this force when I most desperately needed it. It was
not easy for me to change the pattern of my living from a negative
one to a constructive one and I had a little trouble from time to
time in the beginning in attempting my new life.
The most seriously
difficulty I had was met by this same man who sought me out and dug
me out and whom I couldn't refuse to see and when he spoke to me, he
said something that I'll never forget. Something that is having is
culmination here today. He asked me if I wanted to stop drinking.
I said, "yes" He put his arm around me and he said, "I'm
glad because we have a long way to go together."
Neither of us knew back
in 1939 how far that road led or where it was going to lead but we
are still traveling that road together and it's lead up all the way,
up and on.
I believe that the
contribution that was made by this instrument, if you like, is a
contribution past description, past telling. I believe that it was
largely through that contribution which produced living proof that we
have been able to arrive at a meeting such as today where we have
been able to bring together representatives of all the professional
disciplines who are happily and gladly working in this field as
this wasn't always true fifteen years ago. But we were able to get
great names in medicine and psychiatry and social work and psychology
and in public health to be present at a meeting like this, to take
part in what we are doing, to join hands with that little band of
recovered alcoholics to help lick this problem.
Alcoholics Anonymous
couldn't do it alone. We couldn't expect any other victims of a
particular affliction to carry the whole burden of doing something
about that particular disease and we shouldn't expect it in this
field. To lick a problem as complex, as vast and as devastating as
alcoholism requires the cooperation of every one of us, of every area
of our life. To have that cooperation we had to have evidence that
it could produce them. That evidence exists in the growing ranks of
Alcoholics Anonymous and that truth exists because back in 1934,
one man got sober and allowed himself to be used as the great
instrument in spreading this word of hope. In my books he is one of
the greatest men of our times. I give you my friend, my sponsor,
the reason why I am here, Bill.
Address by Bill W.
Well folks, our world
is certainly a world of contrast, it was only a few year ago that
Westbrook Pegler wrote a piece in which he described Dr. Bob and me
as "the wet brain founders of Alcoholics Anonymous." But
very seriously and very happily, too, I think that the A.A.'s present
in and out of this Committee and everywhere join in with Lois and me
and are able to say that this is one of the finest hours that has yet
to come to us.
Some people say that
destiny is a series of events held together by a thin thread of
change or circumstance. Other people say that destiny is composed
of a series of events strung on a cord of cause and effect and still
others say that the destiny of good work is often the issue of the
will of God and that he forges the links and brings the events to
pass. I've been asked to come here to tell the story of A.A. and in
that story, everyone here I am sure can find justification for either
of those points of view.
But, I want to tell
more than the story of A.A., this time. I was beset, I must
confess, by a certain reluctance and the reluctance issues out of
this fact, of course everybody is fairly familiar with the fact that
I once suffered from alcoholism, but people are not so wise to the
fact that I suffer also from schizophrenia, split personality. I have
a personality say as a patriarch of A.A., founding father, if you
like, and I also have a personality as an A.A. member and between
these personalities is a terrific gulf.
You see, a founding
father of A.A. has to stand up to the A.A. Tradition which says that
you must not endorse anything or anybody or even say good things
about your friends on the outside or even of Beemans chewing gum lest
it be an endorsement. So as the father of A.A. I am very strictly
bound to do nothing but tell the story of our society. But as an
A.A. member like all the rest, I am an anarchist who revels in litter
so I'm really going to say what I damn please. So, if only you will
receive me as Mr. Anonymous, one of the poor old drunks still trying
to get honest!
Now to our narrative
and to the first links in the chain of events that has led us to this
magnificent hour. I was by no means the first link in this chain
and only one of very many. I think the founder business ought to be
well deflated and I'm just going to take a minute or two to do it.
As a fact, the first
link in the chain was probably forged about twenty-five years ago in
the office of a great psychiatrist, Carl Jung. At that time he had
as a patient a certain very prominent American businessman. They
worked together for a year. My business friend Rolland was a very
grim case of alcoholism and yet under the doctor's guidance he
thought he was going to find release. He left the doctor in great
confidence but shortly, he was back drunk. Said he to Dr. Jung,
"what now, You're my court of last resort." The doctor
looked at him and said, "I thought that you might be one of
those rare cases that could be touched with my art, but you aren't.
I have never seen," continued Doctor Jung, one single case of
alcoholism recover, so grave as yours under my tutelage."
Well, to my friend
Rolland this was tantamount to a sentence of death. "But
doctor," said he, "is there no other course, nothing else."
"Yes," said Dr. Jung, "there is something. There is
such a thing as a transforming spiritual experience." "Well,"
Rolland beamed, "after all I've been a vestryman in the
Episcopal Church, I'm a man of faith." "Oh," Dr.
Jung said, "that's fine so far as it goes but it has to go a lot
deeper. I'm speaking of transforming spiritual experiences."
"Where would I find such a thing, asked Rolland. Dr. Jung
said, "I don't know, lighting strikes here or there, it strikes
any other place. We don't know why or how. You will just have
to expose yourself in the religion of your own choice or a spiritual
influence as best you can and just try and ask and maybe it will be
open to you."
So my friend Rolland
joined up with the Oxford Groups, the sometime Buchmanites of that
day, first in London and then came to New York and lo and behold the
lighting did strike and he found himself unaccountably released of
his obsession to drink.
After a time he heard
of a friend of mine, a chap we call Ebby, who sojourned every summer
in Vermont, an awful grim case, he had driven his father's bright,
shiny new Packard into the side of someone's house. He had bashed
into the kitchen, pushing aside the stove and had said to the
startled lady there, "how about a cup of coffee." The
neighbors thought that this was enough and that he needed to be
locked up. He was taken before Judge Graves in Bennington, Vermont,
a place not too far from my home, by the way and there our friend
Rolland heard of it and gathering a couple of Oxford Groupers
together, one of them an alcoholic the other just a two fisted
drinker, they took Ebby in tow and they inoculated him with very
simple ideas: that he, Ebby, could not do this job on his own
resources, that he had to have help; that he might try the idea of
getting honest with himself as he never had before; he might try the
idea of making a confession of his defects to someone; he might try
the idea of making restitution or harms done; he might try the idea
of giving of himself to others with no price tag on it; agnostic he
was, he might try the idea of praying to whatever God there was.
That was the essence of what my friend Ebby abstracted from the
Oxford Groups of that day. True, we later rejected very much of the
other things they had to teach us. It is true that these principles
might have been found somewhere else but as it happens they were
found there.
Ebby for a time got the
same phenomenon of release and then he remembered me. He was brought
to New York and lodged at Calvary Mission and soon called me up while
I lay home drinking in Brooklyn. I will never forget that day as
suddenly he stood in the areaway, I hadn't seen him for a long time.
By this time I knew something of the gravity of my plight. I
couldn't put my finger on it but he seemed strangely changed, besides
he was sober. He came in and began to talk. I offered him some
grog. I remember I had a big jug of gin and pineapple juice there,
the pineapple juice was there to convince Lois that I wasn't drinking
straight gin. No, he didn't care for a drink. No, he wasn't
drinking. "What's got into you," I asked. "Well,"
he said, "I've got religion." Well, that was rough on me.
He's got religion! He had substituted religious insanity for
alcoholic insanity. Well, I had to be polite so I asked, "what
brand is it." And, he said, "I wouldn't exactly call it a
brand. I've come across a group of people who have sold me on
getting honest with myself; who sold me on the idea that I am
powerless over my problems and have taught me to help others so I'm
trying to bring something to you, if you want it. That's it."
So, in his turn, he transmitted to me these simple ideas across the
kitchen table.
Meanwhile, another
chain of events had been taking place. In fact, the earliest link
in that chain runs back to William James who is sometimes called
the father of modern psychology. Another link in the chain was my
own Doctor William Duncan Silkworth, who I think will someday be
counted as a medical saint.
I had the usual
struggle with this problem and had met Dr. Silkworth at Towns
Hospital. He had explained in very simple terms what my problem
was: an obsession that condemned me to drink against my will and
increasing physical sensitivity which guaranteed that I would go mad
unless I could somehow find release, perhaps through re-education.
He taught me the nature of the malady.
But here I was, again
drinking. But here was my friend talking to me over the kitchen
table. Already, you see, the elements which lie today in the
foundation of A.A. were already present. The God of science in the
persons of Dr. Silkworth and Dr. Jung had said "No" on the
matters of psychiatry, psychology and medicine. They can't do it
alone. Your will power can't do it alone. So, the rug had been
pulled out from under Roland Hazard and Hazard, an alcoholic had
pulled the rug out from under Ebby and now he was pulling it out from
under me while quoting Dr. Jung and substantiating what Dr. Silkworth
had let leak back to me through Lois.
So, the stage was
really set and it had been some years in the setting before it ever
caught up with me. Of course, I had balked at this idea of a power
greater than myself, although the rest of the program seemed sensible
enough. I was desperate, willing to try anything, but I still did
gag on the God business. But at length, I said to myself as has
every A.A. member since, "who am I to say there is no God? Who
am I to say how I am going to get well?" Like a cancer
patient, I am now ready to do anything, to be dependent upon any kind
of a physician and if there is a great physician, I had better seek
him out.
So, pretty drunk, I
went back to Towns Hospital, was put to bed and three days later my
friend appears again. One alcoholic talking to another across that
strange powerful bond that we can effect with each other. In his
one hand and in the hands of the doctor was hopelessness and on the
other side was hope. He went through his little list of principles;
getting honest, making restitution, working with other people,
praying to whatever God there was, then he left. When he had gone,
I sunk into a terrific depression, the like of which I had never
known and I suppose for a moment the last vestiges of my prideful
obstinacy were crushed out at great depth and I cried out like a
child, "now I'll do anything, anything to get well," and
with no faith and almost no hope I again cried out, "if there is
a God, will he show himself." Immediately the place lit up in
a great light. It seemed to me that I was on a mountain top, there
was a sudden realization that I was free, utterly free of this
thing and as the ecstasy subsided I am again on the bed and now I'm
surrounded by a sense of presence and a mighty assurance and a
feeling that no matter how wrong things were, ultimately all would be
well. I thought to myself, so this is the God of the preachers.
From that day to this,
I have scarcely been tempted to drink, so instantaneous and terrific
was the release from the obsession. At about the time of my release
from the hospital, somebody handed me a copy of William James' book
Varieties of Religious Experience. Many of us disagree with James'
pragmatic philosophy but I think that nearly all will agree that this
is a great text in which he examines these mechanisms. And in that
book of his, great numbers, the great majority of these experiences
took off from a base of utter hopelessness. In some controlling
area of the individual's life he had struck a wall and couldn't get
under, around or over. That kind of hopelessness was the forerunner
of the transforming experience and as I began to read those common
denominators stuck out of the cases cited by James.
I began to wonder.
Yes, I fitted into that pattern but why hadn't more alcoholics fitted
into it before now? In other words, what we needed was more
deflation at depth to lay hold of this transforming experience.
Then comes Dr.
Silkworth with the answer, those two little words: the obsession and
the allergy. Not such little words, big words, the twin ogres of
madness and death, of science pronouncing its verdict of hopelessness
so far as our own resources were concerned. Yes, I had had that
dose. That had perhaps laid the ground. One alcoholic talking to
another had convinced me where no others had brought me any
conviction.
I began to race around
madly trying to help alcoholics and in gratitude I briefly joined the
Oxford Group but they were more interested in saving the world than
other alcoholics. That didn't last too long and I began to tell
people of this sudden mystic experience and I fear that I was
preaching a great deal and not one single drunk sobered up for a
period of six months.
Again, comes the man of
medicine, Dr. Silkworth and he said, "Bill, you've got the cart
before the horse. Why don't you stop talking about this queer
experience of yours and of all this morality. Why don't you pour
into these people how medically sick they are and then, maybe coming
from you or with the identification you can get with these other
fellows, then maybe you'll soften them up so they'll buy this moral
psychology.
About that time I had
been urged to get back into business and quit being a missionary and
I hooked onto a business deal which took me to Akron, Ohio. The
deal fell through and for the first time I felt tempted to drink. I
was in the hotel with about ten dollars in my pocket and my new found
friends had disappeared. I thought to myself, gee, you'd better
look for another alcoholic to work with.
Then I realized as
never before how working with other alcoholics had played such a
great part in sustaining my original experience.
Well, again friends
came to the rescue. I went down to the lobby and looked at the
Church Directory and absentmindedly drew my finger down the list of
names and there appeared a rather odd one, the Reverend Tunks. I
said, "well, I'll call up Tunks" and he turned out to be
wonderful Episcopal clergyman. I said that I was a drunk looking
for another drunk to work on and tried to explain why. The good man
showed some alarm as it wasn't everyday someone called up with my
request but the good man gave me a list of about ten names, some of
them Oxford Groupers. I called all of these people up. Well,
Sunday was coming and maybe they would see me in Church, some were
going out of town.
I exhausted that list,
all but one. None had time nor cared very much. Something not
very strange under the circumstances so I went down and took another
look in the bar and something said to me "you had better call
her up." Her name was Henrietta Seiberling and I took her to
be the wife of a tire tycoon out there who I had once met and I
thought that this lady certainly isn't going to want to see me on a
Saturday afternoon. But I called and she said, "come right
out, I'm not an alcoholic but I think I understand."
This led to the meeting
with Dr. Bob, one of my many co-partners in this enterprise, and as
Dr. Silkworth had suggested I poured into him how sick we were and
that produced his immediate recovery.
I went to live in the
Smith's house and presently Bob said, "Hadn't we better start
working with alcoholics." I said, "sure, I think we had."
We found an opportunity
at City Hospital in Akron, who was being brought in with D.T.'s on a
stretcher. He'd been hospitalized six times in four months and
couldn't even get home without getting stewed. That was to be A.A.
number three, the first man on the bed.
Dr. Bob and I went to
see him and he said, "I'm too far gone and besides, I'm a man of
faith. Nevertheless, we poured it into him, the medical
hopelessness of this thing so far as one's own resources are
concerned. We explained what had happened to us, we made clear to
him his future. And the next morning we came back and he was saying
to his wife, "give me my clothes, were going to get up and get
out of here. These are the men, they are the ones who understand."
Right then and there
was formed the first A.A. group in the summer of 1935. The
synthesis in it's main outline was complete.
But Lord, we hadn't'
even started. The struggles of those next few years. A wonderful
thing to think about. Terribly slow was our growth. We got way
into 1939 before we had produced even a hundred recoveries in Akron
and in New York, a few in Cleveland, Ohio.
Then, in that year, the
Cleveland Plain Dealer ran pieces about us of such strength that the
few A.A.'s in Cleveland were flooded with hundreds of cases and that
added one more needed ingredient.
Up to this time it had
been deadly slow. Could this thing spread? Could we get into mass
production?
Well, in a matter of
months, twenty Clevelanders had sobered up several hundred newcomers.
But that required hospitalization and we were not liked in the
hospitals.
Now, I come to the
subject of this Committee, it's relation with A.A. and the linkage
between us. Meanwhile, great events were going on down here (New
York), there had been in preparation a book to be called Alcoholics
Anonymous.
As a precaution we had
made mimeograph copies to be passed around and one of these copies
was sent to a man who I consider to be one of the greatest friends
that this society can ever have, Dr. Harry Tiebout, the one-time
Chairman of this Committee. Harry Tiebout was the man who got me
before the medical societies and that took great courage. Well, I'm
getting ahead of my story.
So Harry got one of the
mimeographed copies of the A.A. book and he hands it to a certain
patient at the Blythewood Sanitarium in Greenwich, Connecticut. The
patient was a lady. She read the book and it made her very mad so
she threw it out the window and got drunk. That was the first
impact of Alcoholics Anonymous. Harry got her sobered up and handed
her the book again and a phrase caught her eye, it was a trigger.
"We cannot live with resentments," the book said. This
time she didn't throw it out the window.
Presently she came to
our little meeting and you must remember that we were still less than
a hundred strong in the early part of 1939 at our little Brooklyn
house at 182 Clinton Street. And she came back from that meeting to
Greenwich and made a remark that today is a classic in A.A. She
said to a fellow patient and sufferer and friend in the sanitarium,
"Grannies, we're not alone anymore, this is it."
Well, that was the
beginning for Marty. Much help by Harry and Mrs. Willey, the
proprietor of the place. Marty started the first group on the
grounds of the sanitarium. She began to frantically work with
alcoholics and became the dean of our women alcoholics. So our
society had made two terrific friends in Dr. Harry and Marty.
Now, in the intervening
years up to 1944, A.A. itself was in a bad turmoil. The Saturday
Evening Post piece had been published which caused 6,000 frantic
inquiries to hit our post office box here in New York, from all over
the country, indeed, all over the world. So then the great question
was posed. Could A.A. spread? Could it function? Could it hang
together with it's enormous neurotic content that we have.
We just did not know.
But again, it was do or die. In old Ben Franklin's words, "we
would either hang together or hang separately."
Out of this group
experience there began to evolve Traditions. Traditions which had to
do with A.A.'s unity and function and relation with the world outside
and our relations to such things as money, property, prestige, all
that sort of thing.
The Traditions of
Alcoholics Anonymous, with you folks, for the most part are familiar.
Those principles began to take shape, began to gather for us and
little by little, order began to come out of this seething mass of
drunks in their quest for sobriety.
By now, the membership
of the movement had run up into the many thousands and as Marty
observed, there was now proof that it can be done. But we were
still a long way from today. A.A. still needed friends. Friends
of medicine, friends of religion, friends of the press. We had a
handful but we needed a lot of friends.
The public needed to
know what sort of malady this was and that something could be done
about it. This Committee, much like Alcoholics Anonymous is notable
not only for what it has done in its own sphere but for what it has
set in motion.
I remember very well
when this Committee started. It brought me in contact with our
great friends at Yale, the courageous Dr. Haggard, the incredible Dr.
Jellinek or Bunky as we affectionately know him and Seldon [Bacon]
and all those dedicated people.
The question arose,
could an A.A. member get into education or research or what not?
Then ensued a fresh and great controversy in A.A. which was not
surprising because you must remember that in that period we were like
the people on Rickenbacker's raft. Who would dare to rock us ever
so little and precipitate us back into the alcohol sea.
So, frankly, we were
afraid and as usual we had the radicals and we had the conservatives
and we had moderates on this question of whether A.A. members could
go into other enterprises in this field. The conservatives said,
"no, let's keep it simple, let's mind our own business."
The radicals said, "Let's endorse anything that looks like it
will do any good, let the A.A. name be used to raise money and to do
whatever it can do for the whole field," and the growing body of
moderates took the position, "let any A.A. member who feels the
call go into these related fields for if we are to do less it would
be a very antisocial outlook." So that is where the Tradition
finally sat and many were called and many were chosen since that day
to go into these related fields which has now got to be so large in
their promise that we of Alcoholics Anonymous are getting down to
our right size and we are only now realizing that we are only a small
part of a great big picture.
We are realizing again,
afresh, that without our friends, not only could we not have existed
in the first place but we could not have grown. We are getting a
fresh concept in A.A. of what our relations with the world and all of
these related enterprises should be. In other words, we are growing
up.
In fact last year at
St. Louis we were bold enough to say we had come of age and that
within Alcoholics Anonymous the main outlines of the basis for
recovery, of the basis for unity and of the basis for service or
function were already evident.
At St. Louis I made
talks upon each of those subjects which largely concerned themselves
about what A.A. had done about these things but here we are in a much
wider field and I think that the sky is the limit. I think that I
can say without any reservation that what this Committee has done
with the aid of it's great friends who are now legion as anyone
here can see. I think that this Committee has been responsible for
making more friends for Alcoholics Anonymous and of doing a wider
service in educating the world on the gravity of this malady and
what can be done about it than any other single agency.
I'm awfully partial and
maybe I'm a little biased because here sits the dean of all our
ladies, my close, dear and beloved friend. So speaking out of turn
as a founder, I want to convey to her in the presence of all of you
the best I can say of my great love and affection is thanks.
At the close of things
in St. Louis, I remember that I likened A.A. to a cathedral style
edifice whose corners now rested across the earth. I remember
saying that we can see on its great floor the Twelve Steps of
Alcoholics Anonymous and there assembled maybe 150,000 sufferers and
their families. We have seen side walls go up, buttressed with the
A.A Tradition and at St. Louis, when the elected Conference took
over from our Board of Trustees, the spire of service was put into
effect and its beacon light, the beacon light of A.A. shone there
beckoning to all the world.
I realized as I sat
here today that that was not a big enough concept, for on the floor
of the cathedral of the spirit there should always be written the
formula from whatever source for release from alcoholism, whether it
be a drug, whether it be the psychiatric art, whether it be the
ministrations of this Committee.
In other words, we who
deal with this problem are all in the same boat, all standing upon
the same floor. So let's bring to this floor the total resources
that can be brought to bear upon this problem and let us not think of
unity just in terms of the A.A.
Tradition. Let us
think of unity among all those who work in the field as the kind of
unity that befits brotherhood and sisterhood and a kinship in the
common suffering. Let us stand together in the spirit of service.
If we do these things, only then can we declare ourselves really come
of age. And only then, and I think this is a time not far off, I
think we can say that the future, our future, the future of this
Committee, of A.A. and of the things that people of good will are
trying to do in this field will be completely assured.
Thank you.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.