July 1995
Dr. Paul's story
"Doctor, Alcoholic, Addict" was published in the Third
Edition of the Big Book; his remarks on acceptance, which appear on
pages 449 and 450, have been helpful to many AA members over the
years. This interview was conducted by telephone to Dr. Paul's home
in California.
Grapevine: How did you
come to write the story that's in the Big Book?
Dr. Paul: The editor of
the Grapevine - a woman named Paula C. - was also the chairperson of
the committee to review the stories. She wrote to tell me that the magazine was going to
use an article I'd written on why doctors shouldn't prescribe pills
for alcoholics. So she knew my writing a little bit and she asked me
if I had a dual problem and would I be willing to write an article
about it for consideration in the Big Book. My reaction to that was
the same as my reaction when it was suggested I come to AA - I
thought it was one of the dumbest ideas I'd ever heard and I ignored
her letter.
Later on she called and
asked for the article, and I lied and said I hadn't had time to
write it. She extended the deadline and called me a second time. I
had a gal working in the office with me who was in the program, and
she thought it would be nice to have typed a story that might end up
in the Big Book, so she said to me, "You write it, I'll type it,
and we'll send it in."
So that's what we did.
But by that time they had done another printing of the Second
Edition, and I thought, Fine, that means they won't use it. But Paula
said she liked it and the Grapevine published it with the title
"Bronzed Moccasins" and an illustration of a pair of
bronze moccasins. Eventually it was put in the Big Book, but the
title was changed, and my guess is that they wanted to show that an
alcoholic could be a professional and be an addict, but that wouldn't
make him not an alcoholic. It worked well but maybe it overshot the
mark, and now one of the most uncomfortable things for me is when
people run up to me at a meeting and tell me how glad they are the
story is in the book. They say they've been fighting with their home
group because their home group won't let them talk about drugs. So
they show their group the story and they say, "By God, now
you'll have to let me talk about drugs." And I really hate to
see the story as a
divisive thing. I don't think we came to AA to fight each other.
Grapevine: Is there
anything you regret having written in your story?
Dr. Paul: Well, I must
say I'm really surprised at the number of people who come up to me
and ask me confidentially if what they've heard on the very best
authority - usually from their sponsor - is true: that there are
things in my story I want to change, or that I regret having written
it, or that I want to take it out because it says so much about
drugs, or that I've completely changed my mind that AA is the answer,
or even that acceptance is the answer. I've also heard -- on the best
authority! -- that I've died or gotten drunk or taken pills. The
latest one was that my wife Max died and that I got so depressed I
got drunk. So, is there anything I'd like to change? No. I believe
what I said more now than when I wrote it.
Grapevine: Do you think
that your story might help those who are dually addicted?
Dr. Paul: I think the
story makes clear the truth that an alcoholic can also be an addict,
and indeed that an alcoholic has a constitutional right to have as
many problems as he wants! But I also think that if you're not an
alcoholic, being an addict doesn't make you one. The way I see it, an
alcoholic is a person who can't drink and who can't use drugs, and an
addict is a person who can't use drugs and can't drink. But that
doesn't mean that every AA meeting has to be open to a discussion of
drugs if it doesn't want to. Every meeting has the right to say it
doesn't want drugs discussed.
People who want to
discuss drugs have other places where they can go to talk about that.
And AA is very open to living the Steps and Traditions to other
groups who want to use them. I know this from my own experience,
because I wrote to the General Service Office and got permission to
start Pills Anonymous and Chemical Dependency Anonymous. I did that
when I was working in the field of chemical dependency. We started
groups but I didn't go to them because I get everything I need from
AA. I don't have any trouble
staying away from talking about drugs, and I never introduce myself
as an alcoholic/addict. I'm annoyed -- or maybe irritated is a better
word -- by the people who keep insisting that AA should broaden to
include drugs and addictions other than alcohol. In fact I hear it
said that AA should change its name to Addicts Anonymous. I find that
a very narrow-minded view based on people's personal opinions and not
on good sense.
History tells us that
the Washingtonians spread themselves so thin they evaporated. Jim B.
says the greatest thing that ever happened in AA was the publication
of the Big Book, because it put in writing what the program was and
made it available all over the world. So wherever you go it's the
same program. I don't see how you could change the program unless you
change the book and I can't see that happening.
Grapevine: It's a
question of singleness of purpose?
Dr. Paul: That
singleness of purpose thing is so significant. It seems to be
working; why would we change it? I can't think of any change that
would be an improvement.
Grapevine: Nowadays
drunks often come to meetings already dried out, but that wasn't always the case.
Dr. Paul: No, it
wasn't. You don't get Twelfth Step calls as dramatic as they used to
be. Now I find that if you're called upon to make a Twelfth Step
call, it'll be on somebody who is in the hospital. You find out when
they're available and not in some other kind of meeting, and make an
appointment. But this might change as the number of treatment
programs begins to fade out.
I used to make "cold
turkey" calls, where the alcoholic hadn't asked for help. One
time I went to see this guy who was described to me as a big husky
fellow. He was holed up in a motel. I found out from the manager of
the motel that he was on the second floor, and as I was walking up
the outside stairs to get to his place, I thought to myself, if this
guy comes charging out the door, he could easily throw me over the
stair railing and I'd end up on the concrete. So I thought, well, the
good news is I'd probably be one of AA's first martyrs. Then I
thought, yeah, but I'd be an anonymous martyr. I made the call
anyhow, and he got sober for a while.
Grapevine: In your Big
Book story, you say that acceptance is the key to everything. I
wonder if you've ever had a problem accepting what life hands you.
Dr. Paul: I think today
that my job really is to enjoy life whether I like it or not. I don't
like everything I have to accept. In fact, if everything was to my
specifications and desires there would be no problem with acceptance.
It's accepting things I
don't like that is difficult. It's accepting when I'm not getting my
own way. Yes, I find it very difficult at times.
Grapevine: Anything
specific?
Dr. Paul: Nothing
major, though it sometimes seems major that I have to accept living
with my wife Max and her ways of doing things! She is an entirely
different person than I am. She likes clutter, I like things orderly.
She thinks randomly and I like structured thinking. We're very, very
different. We never should have gotten married! Last December we were
married fifty-five years.
Grapevine: I guess she
knows your thoughts on this matter.
Dr. Paul: Ad nauseam.
Grapevine: You're still
going to meetings?
Dr. Paul: I'd say five
or six a week.
Grapevine: Do you and
Max go to meetings together?
Dr. Paul: Max isn't in
AA, she's in Al-Anon and she's still very active in it. But I go to
Al-Anon too, and that helps a great deal, and Max comes to open AA
meetings with me and that helps too. It's kind of like Elsa C. used
to say: when two people have their individual programs, it's like
railroad tracks, two separate and parallel rails, but with all those
meetings holding them together.
Grapevine: Do you think
you'd still be married if you hadn't gone to meetings all these
years?
Dr. Paul: I'm sure we
wouldn't. I initially thought that the Serenity Prayer said I'd have
to change the things I couldn't accept. So I thought, well, we can't
get along so it's time to change the marriage. I used to go around
looking for old-timers who would agree with me and say that's what
the Serenity Prayer meant. But Max and I finally made a commitment to
the marriage and stopped talking about divorce and started working
our programs. In fact we tend to sponsor each other, which is a
dangerous thing to do, but we help each other see when we need more
meetings, or need to work a certain
Step or something like
that.
Grapevine: Do you have,
or did you have, a sponsor?
Dr. Paul: Early on I
was talking to a friend of mine, Jack N., who was sober a couple of
months longer than I was. Jack and his wife and Max and I used to go
to AA speaker meetings together. I was telling him how my home group
was nagging at me because I didn't have a sponsor, and on the spur of
the moment I said, "Why don't you be my sponsor?" and on
the spur of the moment he said to me, "I'll be your sponsor if
you'll be my sponsor." And I said, "I don't know if they'll
allow that." But we decided to try it and it worked out. He
calls me because I'm his sponsor and I call him because he's my
sponsor so I guess we call each other twice as often. We're still
sponsoring each other That's been going on for twenty-seven years. He
moved to L.A. but we stay in touch, mostly by phone.
Grapevine: Is there a
tool or a slogan or a Step that is particularly useful to you right now?
Dr. Paul: Pretty much
every morning, before I get out of bed, I say the Serenity Prayer,
the Third Step Prayer, and the Seventh Step Prayer. Then Max and I
repeat those prayers along with other prayers and meditations at
breakfast. And I say those three prayers repeatedly throughout the
day. I grew up thinking that I had to perfect my personality, then I
got into AA, and AA said, no, that isn't the way we do it: only God
can remove our defects. I was amazed to find that I couldn't be a
better person simply by trying harder!
What I've done with a
number of problems -- like fear and depression and insomnia -- is to
treat them as defects of character, because they certainly affect my
personality adversely With depression, I've never taken any
antidepressants. Instead, with any defect I want to get rid of, I
become willing to have it removed, then I ask God to remove it, then
I act like he has. Now, I know God has a loophole that says he'll
remove it unless it's useful to you or to my fellows. So I tell him
I'd like my defect removed completely, but he can sleep on it, and in
the morning he can give me the amount he wants me to
have, and I'll accept it as a gift from him. I'll take whatever he
gives me. I've never done that when he hasn't removed a great deal of
my defect, but I've never done it when he has permanently and totally
removed any defect. But the result is that I no longer fight myself
for having it.
Grapevine: That's a
helpful way of seeing things. It makes defects into a gift.
Dr. Paul: That's right.
And it's the Rule Sixty-two business [see Twelve Steps and Twelve
Traditions, p. 149]. It's like Father Terry always says, "Be
friendly with your defects." In fact some poet said, "Hug
your demon, otherwise it'll bite you in the ass." Poets can talk
like that.
Grapevine: Has your
sponsoring changed over the years?
Dr. Paul: I do a lot
more stuff by telephone. When I'm speaking at a meeting, if I think
of it, I give out my home phone number. So I get a lot of phone calls
from all over the country. People ask me if I'm willing to help them
as a sponsor and I tell them, well, you call me every day for thirty
days, or maybe sixty or ninety or whatever, and then they call me
every day, and we get to know each other, and during that time we
find out what it's like to be relating to each other. It's kind of a
probationary period. Then if they still want me to be their sponsor,
we'll go ahead and if they don't, we move on and there's no loss. And
this gets them accustomed to calling, so when
they have a problem,
they don't have to analyze it at great depth and decide if it's bad
enough that they should bother me with a phone call. I haven't
personally been doing each Step individually with people as much, but
I've redone all the Steps myself on an average of every five years.
And every time I've done that, my sobriety has stepped up to a new
plateau, just like the first time I did them.
Sometimes people call
me because they're feeling in a funk, their sponsor has moved away or
died, or they've moved away from their sponsor, or the meetings don't
mean much anymore. They aren't getting anything out of AA. And
because of my relationship with pills, I've had a lot of people come
to me and say they've got -- what do you call it? -- a "chemical
imbalance." They're seeing a counselor who says, "Yeah,
you're depressed," and the counselor wants to start them on an
antidepressant. My suggestion is, if you want to do something like
that and you haven't done the Steps in a number of years, do the
Steps first. And repeatedly people will do that and decide they don't
need the pills
.
Grapevine: When you
speak at out-of-state AA meetings, does Max go with you?
Dr. Paul: I don't go
unless she goes.
Grapevine: Why not?
Dr. Paul: Because I
decided I didn't come to AA to become a traveling salesman and be
away from home. So we go where it's a big enough event that they can
take us both. And what's really more fun is if it's a mixed event
where Max can speak, especially if she gets to speak first. She likes
that. She likes to say that I say that she tells a perverted version
of my drinking story. Then she points out that I was the one who was
drinking and she was the one who was sober.
Grapevine: There are
many more young people in the Fellowship now. Do you think young
people have special problems because they're getting sober at such an
early age?
Dr. Paul: People always
say they're so glad to see the young people come in, and I agree, but
I'm glad to see the old people come in too. I like to see anybody get
sober. It's hard to say whether your pain is greater than my pain or
mine's greater than yours. I'm sure that young people have problems,
but we all have problems -- gays have problems, people who are
addicted to other drugs have problems, single people have problems. I
can't think of anything more of a problem than being a woman
alcoholic trying to get sober, married to a practicing alcoholic
male, and with a handful of kids. That must be about as big a problem
as you can get. Everybody has special problems. I've said it often
and I haven't had any reason to change my mind: the way I see it,
I've never had a problem and nobody will ever come to me with a
problem such that there won't be an answer in the Steps. That gives
me a great deal of confidence. I think the program -- the Steps -
covers everything conceivable.
I'm getting way off
from what you asked me. I can't give short answers. I often tell
people that the more I know about something, the shorter the answer,
but when I don't know, I just make up stuff.
Grapevine: Did you find
it helpful at some point to become familiar with the Traditions?
Dr. Paul: I find the
Steps easier to understand than the Traditions and the Traditions
easier to understand than the Concepts. In fact, I find the long form
of the Traditions considerably easier to understand than the short
form, and I find that the long form is much more specific on the idea
that AA is for alcoholics and not for just anybody who wants to come
in. A lot of people like that phrase "The only requirement for
membership is a desire to stop drinking," and people interpret
that to mean that if you're willing to not drink, you can call
yourself an alcoholic and a member of AA. That's not at all what it
says. I think it means that if you're an alcoholic with a desire to
stop drinking, that's the only requirement for membership.
Grapevine: How many
years have you been sober now?
Dr. Paul: Twenty-seven.
Grapevine: Twenty-seven
years of meetings. Have you seen any changes in the way the meetings
are conducted?
Dr. Paul: All I see is
that there are more meetings and bigger meetings and more variety of
meetings. I just love to see AA grow. I enjoy meetings. I've been to
meetings in Singapore and Hong Kong and Japan, but I think the most
interesting was when Chuck C. and Al D. and I were vacationing in the
Cayman Islands and we couldn't find any meetings. We were twelfth
stepping alcoholics there and we decided we all needed a meeting, so
we went to the local newspaper and got some publicity. We had a
public information meeting, and we got a regular meeting started. As
far as I know, that meeting is still going.
Grapevine: So you
haven't gotten bored by Alcoholics Anonymous.
Dr. Paul: Well, I
thought about that some years back. Why is it that so many people
aren't around any more? Where do they go? It seems to me that most of
the people who leave AA leave because of boredom. I made up my mind I
wasn't going to get bored, and one of the things I do when I get
bored, if I can't think of anything else to do, is to start a new
meeting. I've probably started fifteen or twenty. The most recent one
was last November.
I got a couple of
friends together and we started a "joy of sobriety" meeting
-- it's a
one-hour topic
discussion meeting and it has to be a topic out of the Big Book and
it has to be on the program and how you enjoy living the program.
It's fast-moving and we just have a lot of fun. It's a great antidote
for depression.
Grapevine: What's the
most important thing you've gotten from AA?
Dr. Paul: This whole
thing is so much more than just sobriety. To be sober and continue
the life I had before -- that would have driven me back to drink. One
of the things I really like about AA is that we all have a sense of
direction, plus a roadmap telling us precisely how to get there. I
like that. All I want out of AA is more and more and more until I'm
gone.
Copyright, AA
Grapevine©, Inc., July 1995
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.